«Meum esse» e «ius Quiritium». Logica, effetti e implicazioni
by Calore, Emanuela
In the expression ex iure Quiritium meum esse, the i.Q. appears as the founding element of the meum esse, which legitimises its affirmation within the community and which at the same time qualifies it. The i.Q. seems at the same time to establish, legitimise and qualify the meum esse, thus indicating the “type” and “strength” of belonging, linked to the potestative position of the Roman pater familias. Before Gaius’ treatment of duplex dominium, the expression e.i.Q. occurs infrequently in the sources. However, the discussion of duplex dominium and the problems that the divisio of the dominium created, particularly with regard to the ownership of slaves, led Gaius and the author of Tit. ex corp. Ulp. to frequently use the expression e.i.Q. alongside dominus to distinguish between those who were e.i.Q. and those who were in bonis habens. The phrase e.i.Q. was a “new use”, but not a “new meaning”. Furthermore, i.Q. is often considered synonymous with civitas Romana, but the testimony of Pliny the Younger, which mentions cases of i.Q. being conceded to the Latini Iuniani, is fundamental in establishing that i.Q. and civitas Romana are two concepts that are connected but distinct.
- Publishing house LED Edizioni Universitarie
- Year of publication 2025
- Number of pages 480
- ISBN 9788855132237
- Foreign Rights Valeria Passerini / Tiziana Battaglia
- Price 52.00
Calore, Emanuela
Emanuela Calore (Rome, 1978) is an associate professor in the scientific disciplinary sector of Roman Law and Foundations of European Law (Giur-15/A) at the Department of Law of the University of Rome Tor Vergata. She has worked on topics in private law (actio quod metus causa, regula volenti non fit iniuria, regula superficies solo cedit, aeterna auctoritas adversus hostem) and public law (the tribune of the plebs, public law norms in the Twelve Tables).